Promoting more future-ready anatomy education after the Covid-19 pandemic: A scoping review.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic caused an abrupt transition from face-to-face to online anatomy teaching, learning, and assessment. Although online education has ensured the continuity of anatomy education during the pandemic, its implementation has been challenging, and its effectiveness has been questioned. Therefore, literature pertinent to online anatomy education during the pandemic is crucial to explain Covid-19's disruptions to this field. Accordingly, this scoping review explored changes, disruptions, and gaps in anatomy teaching and assessment during Covid-19 using an enhanced version of Arksey and O'Malley's six-stage protocol. Five online databases were searched for articles that described changes and disruptions in anatomy education. Three independent researchers were involved in titles, abstracts, and full texts screening, while another four researchers were independently involved in data extraction, charting, and synthesis. This review revealed six themes: immediate strategic plans and actions, teaching and learning changes, online assessment practice, students' and educators' receptivity and adaptability, online learning and assessment effects, and future directions. It also revealed four gaps: non-future-ready curricula, learning obstacles, administrative and teaching challenges, and online education ethical issues. The results were reported in tabular and narrative forms, following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR guidelines). Understanding the evolution and gaps in anatomy education during the Covid-19 pandemic will help anatomists design future-ready, adaptable curricula.

Impact of COVID-19 on medical education in different income countries: a scoping review of the literature.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted medical education worldwide. Universities were forced to rapidly adapt to the evolving situation and develop methods of delivering curricula and assessments online. The purpose of this scoping review was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on medical education and investigate how this effect varies in different income countries. The methodology adhered to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for scoping reviews. Key terms were searched in six electronic databases. Inclusion criteria included studies describing the effect of COVID-19 on undergraduate medical education in university and clinical settings, studies published post 1 December 2019 and studies published in English. A modified Johanna Briggs Institute data charting tool was used to extract data concerning study characteristics and outcomes. The initial search returned 298 articles. Following duplicate removal and article screening, 33 studies were included. The literature indicated that the pandemic had a negative effect on medical student education worldwide, in both high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A range of factors impacted students and educators, including new curriculum and assessment design, reduced patient contact, use of new technology and lack of infrastructure. However, LMICs encountered more arduous barriers such as lack of access to information technology infrastructure and support from national governments. COVID-19 has impeded medical education worldwide. Future research is needed to address barriers to providing medical education during a pandemic. LMICs need particular support as they have fewer resources and face greater challenges regarding this matter.

Factors that affect student engagement in online learning in health professions education.

BACKGROUND: Student engagement is vital in achieving learning outcomes and improving students' motivation, involvement, and attitudes toward learning. The aim of this study was to identify the factors that affect student engagement in online learning in medical and health science colleges. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical and health science students and faculty in May 2020. The Online Engagement Strategies Questionnaire was e-mailed to 370 students and 102 faculty members. The SPSS statistical software was used for the statistical analysis. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify the factors that affected the students' engagement in online learning. Composite scores were calculated for factors, separately for the student and faculty responses. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for the student and faculty responses. RESULTS: The response rates of the students and faculty were 85.1% and 74.1%, respectively. The mean ages of the students and faculty were 20.6 and 44.6 years, respectively. Eighty-five percent of the faculty (n = 51) and 88.3% (n = 278) of the students found that the use of technology in proper communication was an important strategy to engage students in online learning. The factor analysis revealed agreement between the students and faculty regarding the factors that support student engagement in online learning. Techno-pedagogical skills were considered very important for faculty and important for students. For both faculty and students, self-directed learning skills were important, and peer-assisted learning (PAL) was fair symmetry. Nevertheless, collaborative learning (CL) was fairly symmetry to students and important to faculty. CONCLUSION: To enhance student engagement in online learning, faculty members should consider improving their techno-pedagogical skills. Moreover, by incorporating self-directed learning, CL and PAL will support student engagement. Finally, faculty development, updating of course design, and institutional policies are all required to support online learning.

Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges.

Online learning has become the new normal in many medical and health science schools worldwide, courtesy of COVID-19. Satisfaction with online learning is a significant aspect of promoting successful educational processes. This study aimed to identify factors affecting student and faculty satisfaction with online learning during the new normal. Online questionnaires were emailed to students (n = 370) and faculty (n = 81) involved in online learning during the pandemic. The questionnaires included closed- and open-ended questions and were organised into two parts: socio-demographic information and satisfaction with online learning. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the responses to the satisfaction scales. Students' and faculty responses to the open-ended questions were analysed using the thematic analysis method. The response rate was 97.8% for students and 86.4% for faculty. Overall satisfaction among students was 41.3% compared to 74.3% for faculty. The highest areas of satisfaction for students were communication and flexibility, whereas 92.9% of faculty were satisfied with students' enthusiasm for online learning. Technical problems led to reduced student satisfaction, while faculty were hampered by the higher workload and the required time to prepare the teaching and assessment materials. Study-load and workload, enhancing engagement, and technical issues (SWEET) were the themes that emerged from the thematic analysis as affecting student and faculty satisfaction. Adopting a combination synchronous and asynchronous approach, incorporating different applications to engage students, and timely feedback are imperative to increasing student satisfaction, while institutional support and organisational policy could enhance faculty satisfaction.